Showing posts with label orig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label orig. Show all posts

10 February 2013

About "The Elephant" / Про "Слона"

Elephant pin from the Leningrad Zoo



An excerpt from Radio Liberty's program "Over the Barriers," hosted by Alexander Genis.
Episode: What do the Literary Animals Talk About? Air Date: 11/25/1999

Alexander Genis: Lev Vladimirovich, our meetings in the studio cannot end without discussing your poems. I hope that today we will finish this conversation with your animalistic verses.

Lev Loseff: I don’t have too many animalistic poems. …. I do remembered a little poem I wrote before I started writing poetry* while still a university student**, when I was practicing a little versification. I haven’t managed to write anything worthwile during those years, but for some reason there was one poem, which is simply called the "Elephant." It was the only poem from those days that my friends liked, and even, to my great surprise, I found it later published in samizdat, in various passed-around notebooks, and in hand-reproduced albums. I even saw it in Siberia once, it was attributed to someone called “Slutsky.” I do not know why this simple, childish rhyme intrigued my friends at that time. So, here’s a little poem called "The Elephant:" 


The elephant at the zoo is going to die,
like a liner towed off to the breaker’s yard;
he used to wave his trunk, but that’s gone by,
stamping to please the children is too hard.
The elephant at the zoo is going to die,
which makes Mr Head Keeper sad at heart –
what other beast could ever play his part
and act as clever and as big as he?
What else could touch your soul and make you glad,
and fill his cage the way he used to do?
There’s parrots and there’s monkeys by the shed-
load. What’s the point? No elephant – no zoo!


(Translation © 2013 G.S. Smith)

This poem, by the way, was even liked by chiefs of various literary associations, they even wanted to publish it in some almanac, which to me seemed completely unexpected and improbable. The problem then was that “
by the shed-load”*** was not permitted in print by the censors. And because of this I remember that the late Professor Naumov, head of the literary association and editor-in-chief of “Soviet Writer” in Leningrad, changed my line to “The parrot and monkey cage is full.” But I answered “No, the cage is not full,” and did not agree to the change under any circumstances.
---------

*Loseff often said that he started writing poetry in the 1970s and usually dismissed most of what he wrote earlier as juvenilia.

**1954 – Age 17

***The Russian phrase “do khrena” (up to the horseradish, i.e. penis), a mildly vulgar slang term meaning “more than enough,” “too much,” “in excess” is somewhat similar to the English mildly vulgar expression “
shedload/shitload."


-----------

Отрывок из программы Радио Свободы "Поверх барьеров" с Александром Генисом.
Эпизод: О чем говорят литературные животные?  Появилось в эфире: 25/11/1999


Александр Генис: Лев Владимирович, все наши встречи в этой студии не обходятся без ваших стихов. Надеюсь, что мы сегодня закончим эту беседу вашими анималистическими стихами.

Лев Лосев: У меня тоже анималистических стихов не так много. Чтобы наскрести больше, чем одно стихотворение, я вспомнил маленькое стихотворение, которое я написал до того, как я начал писать стихи, еще будучи студентом университета, когда я немножечко упражнялся в версификации. Ничего путного мне в те годы написать не удалось, но почему-то вот это одно стихотворение, которое просто называлось "Слон", - единственное из моих тогдашних сочинений нравилось моим друзьям и даже, к своему большому удивлению, я его потом находил в самиздате, в разных тетрадочках, альбомах переписанных. Даже в Сибири оно мне однажды попалось, и подпись была "Слуцкий" под этим стишком. Я не знаю, что в этом незамысловатом полудетском стишке подкупало моих тогдашних друзей.

Но, в общем, такое маленькое стихотворение "Слон".

В зоопарке помирает слон,
Он отходит, как корабль на слом,
Ему хоботом уже не шевелить,
Ему топотом детей не веселить,
В зоопарке помирает слон,
А директор зоопарка огорчен,
Где отыщется зверь другой,
Чтобы был и умный и большой?
Чтоб умел и шевелить и веселить,
Да и кем теперь клетку заселить?
Попугаев и мартышек до хрена,
Но какой же зоопарк без слона?

Это стихотворение, между прочим, нравилось даже нашим руководителям разных литературных объединений и они даже хотели его напечатать в каком-то альманахе, что было для меня абсолютной неожиданностью и невероятностью. В то время проблема была в том, что нельзя было печатать "до хрена". И поэтому, я помню, что покойный профессор Наумов, руководитель литобъединения и главный редактор "Советского писателя" в Ленинграде даже сам исправил это. Он написал "попугаев и мартышек клеть полна". Но я сказал, что нет, на "клеть полна" я ни на каких условиях не соглашусь.









20 July 2011

Excerpt from: “Exile as a Linguistic Event: Joseph Brodsky and Russian Émigré Poetry” by Yakov Klots

This is the final section of Chapter 4: Brodsky's New York and the "New York Text" of Russian Literature. Here Klots discusses Lev Loseff's poetic response to Brodsky's death, specifically in poems commemorating his life in New York.
Brodsky, Loseff and Loseff's Nova, New York 1981

Post Scriptum

            Brodsky’s death in New York on January 28, 1996, brought an avalanche of elegies by his fellow poets throughout the world, written in different languages. But it is in Lev Losev’s poetry that the reaction to the death of his friend seems to be the most intense, genuine and personal. There are several poems by Losev, in which he paints Brodsky’s portrait through Brodsky’s own words and where he depicts his poet-protagonist in his native Leningrad or in Venice, the “ideal” city of Brodsky’s poetry where his ashes rest on the island of San Michele.[1] But there are also two texts that are set in New York and seek to commemorate Brodsky, so to speak, in the language of the city where he lived for the last twenty years of his life and where he died.
The first poem (Text 1 in the Appendix to this chapter) contrasts the atmosphere of the funeral home on Bleecker Street with the outer space of the city orphaned by the death of its citizen. It is the city that pays true tribute to Brodsky in Losev’s poem by keeping a memory of him alive in its streets. The contrast is maintained through the division of the poem into two stanzas, the second portraying the city rather than the interior of the funeral home. Like a dog that has lost its way home, the wind carries down the scents of the poet’s favorite culinary attractions of Greenwich Village (Chinese food and coffee), as well as the air from the ocean and the river, where Brodsky would often go for a walk. It was an especially cold day in New York, and the only warmth in Losev’s poem comes from a coffee shop, a Chinese restaurant and the ocean that surrounds Manhattan:

Словно пес потерявшийся, ветерок переменный,
вместо палки и мячика, разыгравшись несет,
запашок конопляного масла из китайской пельменной,
теплый вздох океана,
пар кофейный
к похоронному дому и от.
                                                (Losev 2005, 22)

The shifting breeze, like a dog playing games with its owner,
is retrieving – not a ball or a stick, but odours:
whiff of sesame oil from a Chinese take-out,
the ocean’s warm exhalation,
coffee vapour,
wafting them up to the funeral parlour and away.

                                                (tr. G.S. Smith; LLA)

In the second poem (Text 2 in the Appendix to this chapter), Losev revisits the place that used to be Brodsky’s favorite in the city – the embankment of the Hudson in the area of the West Village. It was there that Brodsky took his friend for his first walk in New York, after Losev and his family landed at JFK on June 3, 1976:  

Был тихий летний вечер. Иосиф с несколько таинственным видом сказал мне: “Пойдем! Сейчас ты все увидишь и все поймешь.” Мы захлопнули за собой чугунную калитку и повернули налево. Прошли два небольших квартала и оказались на набережной Гудзона. Как бы продолжением Мортон Стрит служит большой, но обветшалый пирс. Справа к нему навечно, как крейсер Аврора, пришвартован корабль, почему-то превращенный теперь в школу кулинарного ученичества. Слева, свесив ноги, сидели рыбаки и парочки. Две девушки в майках крепко и подолгу целовались. “Правда, ужасно похоже?” спросил Иосиф. “На что?” На Ленинград, где-нибудь на Малой Невке.
Непохоже было ничуть! Гудзон очень широк – куда шире, чем Нева у Стрелки Васильевского острова, не говоря уж о Малой Невке. Вдали виднелся обрывистый, скалистый нью-джерсийский берег. Вниз по течению золотился океанский горизонт. Но так же, как в Ленинграде, пахло рекой, так же плескалась вода под пирсом, так же солнце высвечивало ободранный кирпич пакгауза, так же, в конце концов, можно было не спеша, за несколько минут дойти от реки до дому.

                                    (transcript of Losev’s radio essay for Voice of America; LLA)

It was a warm summer evening. With a slightly mysterious look, Joseph said: “Let’s go! Now you’ll see and understand everything.” We shut the cast-iron gate behind us and turned left. Walked two short blocks and ended up at the embankment of the Hudson. As a kind of extension of Morton Street there is a large albeit dilapidated pier. A ship, which for some reason has now been turned into a culinary school, is moored to the right-hand side of the pier forever, like the cruiser Aurora. On the left-hand side, legs dangling, sat fishermen and couples. Two girls in T-shirts were kissing and for a long time. “Looks terribly similar, doesn’t it?” Joseph asked. “To what?” “To Leningrad, somewhere on the Malaia Nevka.”
            It was not similar at all! The Hudson is very wide – much wider than the Neva near the Strelka of Vasilievsky Island, to say nothing of the Malaia Nevka. In the distance loomed the steep, rocky shore of New Jersey. Down the river, the ocean horizon shone golden. But just as in Leningrad, there was the smell of a river, the water splashed under the pier just the same, the sun was illuminating the shabby brick of the warehouse exactly the same, and finally, in exactly the same way, you could unhurriedly, from the river, in several minutes’ time, walk home.

Brodsky on the Morton St. parking pier on the Hudson, July 1977, Photo: Lev Loseff

           
As in the previous text, here, too, the city serves as a metonymical substitute for the poet: the very landscape of Greenwich Village near the Hudson seems to be irreparably distorted by Brodsky’s death. The river, which used to reflect his features, carries Losev’s memory of his friend down into the ocean, leaving only a faceless “concrete skeleton” where the pier used to be:

Было да сплыло, на то и вода.
Зря вот я трезвым приплелся сюда,
зря не напился.
То, что “сейчас” – это было “потом”.
Тупо гляжу на железобетон.
Нет больше пирса.  

                                    (Losev 2005, 45)

To be and to go; that’s what water is for.
To come here sober was no good at all—
I should have got pie-eyed.
What is ‘here and now’ was ‘later’ then.
So I stare dully at a concrete skeleton.
The pier has disappeared.

                                    (tr. G.S. Smith; LLA)


Two Poems by Lev Losev

Text 1. “В похоронном дому расшушукалась жизнь-выдвиженка...” (Losev 2005, 22). English translation by G.S. Smith (LLA):

* * *

В похоронному дому расшушукалась жизнь-выдвиженка,
и как много ее –
с кучей мертвых цветов Черномырдин, с ТВ Евтушенко,
с Брайтонбича бабье,
и треножники камер, как тонкие ноги карамор,
налетевших на свет, и толпа,
положившая глаз на аристократический мрамор
желтоватого лба.

Словно пес потерявшийся, ветерок переменный,
вместо палки и мячика, разыгравшись несет,
запашок конопляного масла из китайской пельменной,
теплый вздох океана,
пар кофейный
к похоронному дому и от.

* * *

The funeral parlour’s abuzz with life risen up from the ranks,
and more than a little:
Chernomyrdin with bunch of dead blooms, Evtushenko fresh from a telecast,
Brighton Beach biddies,
and camera tripods like lean-legged mosquito marauders
that swarm towards the light. The crowd
casts an eye on the aristocratic marble
of that yellowish brow.

The shifting breeze, like a dog playing games with its owner,
is retrieving – not a ball or a stick, but odours:
whiff of sesame oil from a Chinese take-out,
the ocean’s warm exhalation,
coffee vapour,
wafting them up to the funeral parlour and away.

Brodsky and Loseff on Staten Island Ferry, New York, July 1977



2. “Пирс испарился” (Losev 2005, 45). English translation by G.S. Smith (LLA):

Пирс испарился

Серый линкор отражен в синеве.
Парочки мирно воркуют себе,
гетеро и гомо,
и, как всегда у любой воды,
старый мудак на конце уды.
Тут мы как дома.

Доски повыщерблены. Линкор
на вечном приколе, в нем кулинар-
ная школа.
Плещутся волны. Смех поварят.
Баржи уходят за поворот
плавно и скоро.

То-то сюда мы ходили вдвоем,
друг мой, влюбленный в любой водоем,
я – тоже вроде.
Было да сплыло, исчезло, прошло.
Что вы там плещете, волны, назло?
Что вы там врете?

Было да сплыло, на то и вода.
Зря вот я трезвым приплелся сюда,
зря не напился.
То, что «сейчас» – это было «потом».
Тупо гляжу на железобетон.
Нет больше пирса.  


The Pier that Disappeared

A grey warship reflected in dark blue.
Couples who calmly bill and coo,
both hetero and homo;
plus what by any water you always find:
an old geezer at the end of his line.
This is where we felt at home.

The planking had seen better days. The warship
permanently docked, refashioned
as a catering school.
The waves lap. The cub cooks laugh.
Disappearing round the curve, barges plough
swift and smooth.

This is where we used to come, he and I.
My friend who adored water of any kind,
as I do too—well, sort of.
Now, all that has been and gone, disappeared, passed on.
Why do the lapping waves taunt me so?
Why do they tell tall stories?

To be and to go; that’s what water is for.
To come here sober was no good at all—
I should have got pie-eyed.
What is ‘here and now’ was ‘later’ then.
So I stare dully at a concrete skeleton.
The pier has disappeared.




[1] For example, in “Iosif Brodskii, ili oda na 1957 god” [Joseph Brodsky, or ode to the year 1957], Losev paints the portrait of a young Brodsky standing at an intersection in his native Leningrad that appears to be a rhymed list of concepts that inhabit Brodsky’s mature poetics, set in italics as if to mark a quotation: “душа крест человек чело / век вещь пространство ничего / сад воздух время море рыба / чернила пыль пол потолок / бумага мышь мысль мотылек / снег мрамор дерево спасибо” [soul cross person forehead / age thing space nothing / garden air time sea fish / ink dust floor ceiling / paper mouse thought moth / snow marble tree thank you] (Losev 2000, 274). In Losev’s poem “Gde vozdukh ‘rozovat ot cherepitsy…’” [Where the air is pinkish from the tiling], written three months after Brodsky’s death, Brodsky is back in Venice, accompanied by his own poetic images of the Italian city: “поди поймай, когда ты там повсюду – / то звонко тронешь чайную посуду / церквей, то ветром пробежишь по саду, / невозвращенец, человек в плаще” [it’s useless trying to catch you there as there you’re everywhere – / at one time touching the china / of the churches, at another running like the wind across the garden, a non-returner, a man in an overcoat] (ibid., 329).

Text © Yakov Klots

Brodsky, Garry Voskov, Loseff on Morton Street, New York 1978
Yasha (Yakov) Klots is a literary scholar, translator, and amateur photographer. His interests include Russia and Eastern Europe, Russian émigré literature and culture, linguistics and language philosophy, and New York City. He is currently working on an anthology of Russian poetry about New York. He is the author of Joseph Brodsky in Lithuania (St. Petersburg: Perlov Design Center, 2010; in Russian), which includes his photographs of Lithuanian towns and rural landscapes. Together with Ross Ufberg, he co-translated intro English Tamara Petkevich’s Memoir of a Gulag Actress (DeKalb: Northern Illinois UP, 2010) and Sergei Dovlatov’s The Outpost: Notes of a Correspondent (under submission). He lives in New York City and teaches Russian language and literature at Yale University.

Excerpt from: “Exile as a Linguistic Event: Joseph Brodsky and Russian Émigré Poetry” by Yakov Klots

This is the final section of Chapter 4: Brodsky's New York and the "New York Text" of Russian Literature. Here Klots discusses Lev Loseff's poetic response to Brodsky's death, specifically in poems commemorating his life in New York.
Brodsky, Loseff and Loseff's Nova, New York 1981

Post Scriptum

            Brodsky’s death in New York on January 28, 1996, brought an avalanche of elegies by his fellow poets throughout the world, written in different languages. But it is in Lev Losev’s poetry that the reaction to the death of his friend seems to be the most intense, genuine and personal. There are several poems by Losev, in which he paints Brodsky’s portrait through Brodsky’s own words and where he depicts his poet-protagonist in his native Leningrad or in Venice, the “ideal” city of Brodsky’s poetry where his ashes rest on the island of San Michele.[1] But there are also two texts that are set in New York and seek to commemorate Brodsky, so to speak, in the language of the city where he lived for the last twenty years of his life and where he died.
The first poem (Text 1 in the Appendix to this chapter) contrasts the atmosphere of the funeral home on Bleecker Street with the outer space of the city orphaned by the death of its citizen. It is the city that pays true tribute to Brodsky in Losev’s poem by keeping a memory of him alive in its streets. The contrast is maintained through the division of the poem into two stanzas, the second portraying the city rather than the interior of the funeral home. Like a dog that has lost its way home, the wind carries down the scents of the poet’s favorite culinary attractions of Greenwich Village (Chinese food and coffee), as well as the air from the ocean and the river, where Brodsky would often go for a walk. It was an especially cold day in New York, and the only warmth in Losev’s poem comes from a coffee shop, a Chinese restaurant and the ocean that surrounds Manhattan:

Словно пес потерявшийся, ветерок переменный,
вместо палки и мячика, разыгравшись несет,
запашок конопляного масла из китайской пельменной,
теплый вздох океана,
пар кофейный
к похоронному дому и от.
                                                (Losev 2005, 22)

The shifting breeze, like a dog playing games with its owner,
is retrieving – not a ball or a stick, but odours:
whiff of sesame oil from a Chinese take-out,
the ocean’s warm exhalation,
coffee vapour,
wafting them up to the funeral parlour and away.

                                                (tr. G.S. Smith; LLA)

In the second poem (Text 2 in the Appendix to this chapter), Losev revisits the place that used to be Brodsky’s favorite in the city – the embankment of the Hudson in the area of the West Village. It was there that Brodsky took his friend for his first walk in New York, after Losev and his family landed at JFK on June 3, 1976:  

Был тихий летний вечер. Иосиф с несколько таинственным видом сказал мне: “Пойдем! Сейчас ты все увидишь и все поймешь.” Мы захлопнули за собой чугунную калитку и повернули налево. Прошли два небольших квартала и оказались на набережной Гудзона. Как бы продолжением Мортон Стрит служит большой, но обветшалый пирс. Справа к нему навечно, как крейсер Аврора, пришвартован корабль, почему-то превращенный теперь в школу кулинарного ученичества. Слева, свесив ноги, сидели рыбаки и парочки. Две девушки в майках крепко и подолгу целовались. “Правда, ужасно похоже?” спросил Иосиф. “На что?” На Ленинград, где-нибудь на Малой Невке.
Непохоже было ничуть! Гудзон очень широк – куда шире, чем Нева у Стрелки Васильевского острова, не говоря уж о Малой Невке. Вдали виднелся обрывистый, скалистый нью-джерсийский берег. Вниз по течению золотился океанский горизонт. Но так же, как в Ленинграде, пахло рекой, так же плескалась вода под пирсом, так же солнце высвечивало ободранный кирпич пакгауза, так же, в конце концов, можно было не спеша, за несколько минут дойти от реки до дому.

                                    (transcript of Losev’s radio essay for Voice of America; LLA)

It was a warm summer evening. With a slightly mysterious look, Joseph said: “Let’s go! Now you’ll see and understand everything.” We shut the cast-iron gate behind us and turned left. Walked two short blocks and ended up at the embankment of the Hudson. As a kind of extension of Morton Street there is a large albeit dilapidated pier. A ship, which for some reason has now been turned into a culinary school, is moored to the right-hand side of the pier forever, like the cruiser Aurora. On the left-hand side, legs dangling, sat fishermen and couples. Two girls in T-shirts were kissing and for a long time. “Looks terribly similar, doesn’t it?” Joseph asked. “To what?” “To Leningrad, somewhere on the Malaia Nevka.”
            It was not similar at all! The Hudson is very wide – much wider than the Neva near the Strelka of Vasilievsky Island, to say nothing of the Malaia Nevka. In the distance loomed the steep, rocky shore of New Jersey. Down the river, the ocean horizon shone golden. But just as in Leningrad, there was the smell of a river, the water splashed under the pier just the same, the sun was illuminating the shabby brick of the warehouse exactly the same, and finally, in exactly the same way, you could unhurriedly, from the river, in several minutes’ time, walk home.

Brodsky on the Morton St. parking pier on the Hudson, July 1977, Photo: Lev Loseff

           
As in the previous text, here, too, the city serves as a metonymical substitute for the poet: the very landscape of Greenwich Village near the Hudson seems to be irreparably distorted by Brodsky’s death. The river, which used to reflect his features, carries Losev’s memory of his friend down into the ocean, leaving only a faceless “concrete skeleton” where the pier used to be:

Было да сплыло, на то и вода.
Зря вот я трезвым приплелся сюда,
зря не напился.
То, что “сейчас” – это было “потом”.
Тупо гляжу на железобетон.
Нет больше пирса.  

                                    (Losev 2005, 45)

To be and to go; that’s what water is for.
To come here sober was no good at all—
I should have got pie-eyed.
What is ‘here and now’ was ‘later’ then.
So I stare dully at a concrete skeleton.
The pier has disappeared.

                                    (tr. G.S. Smith; LLA)


Two Poems by Lev Losev

Text 1. “В похоронном дому расшушукалась жизнь-выдвиженка...” (Losev 2005, 22). English translation by G.S. Smith (LLA):

* * *

В похоронному дому расшушукалась жизнь-выдвиженка,
и как много ее –
с кучей мертвых цветов Черномырдин, с ТВ Евтушенко,
с Брайтонбича бабье,
и треножники камер, как тонкие ноги карамор,
налетевших на свет, и толпа,
положившая глаз на аристократический мрамор
желтоватого лба.

Словно пес потерявшийся, ветерок переменный,
вместо палки и мячика, разыгравшись несет,
запашок конопляного масла из китайской пельменной,
теплый вздох океана,
пар кофейный
к похоронному дому и от.

* * *

The funeral parlour’s abuzz with life risen up from the ranks,
and more than a little:
Chernomyrdin with bunch of dead blooms, Evtushenko fresh from a telecast,
Brighton Beach biddies,
and camera tripods like lean-legged mosquito marauders
that swarm towards the light. The crowd
casts an eye on the aristocratic marble
of that yellowish brow.

The shifting breeze, like a dog playing games with its owner,
is retrieving – not a ball or a stick, but odours:
whiff of sesame oil from a Chinese take-out,
the ocean’s warm exhalation,
coffee vapour,
wafting them up to the funeral parlour and away.

Brodsky and Loseff on Staten Island Ferry, New York, July 1977



2. “Пирс испарился” (Losev 2005, 45). English translation by G.S. Smith (LLA):

Пирс испарился

Серый линкор отражен в синеве.
Парочки мирно воркуют себе,
гетеро и гомо,
и, как всегда у любой воды,
старый мудак на конце уды.
Тут мы как дома.

Доски повыщерблены. Линкор
на вечном приколе, в нем кулинар-
ная школа.
Плещутся волны. Смех поварят.
Баржи уходят за поворот
плавно и скоро.

То-то сюда мы ходили вдвоем,
друг мой, влюбленный в любой водоем,
я – тоже вроде.
Было да сплыло, исчезло, прошло.
Что вы там плещете, волны, назло?
Что вы там врете?

Было да сплыло, на то и вода.
Зря вот я трезвым приплелся сюда,
зря не напился.
То, что «сейчас» – это было «потом».
Тупо гляжу на железобетон.
Нет больше пирса.  


The Pier that Disappeared

A grey warship reflected in dark blue.
Couples who calmly bill and coo,
both hetero and homo;
plus what by any water you always find:
an old geezer at the end of his line.
This is where we felt at home.

The planking had seen better days. The warship
permanently docked, refashioned
as a catering school.
The waves lap. The cub cooks laugh.
Disappearing round the curve, barges plough
swift and smooth.

This is where we used to come, he and I.
My friend who adored water of any kind,
as I do too—well, sort of.
Now, all that has been and gone, disappeared, passed on.
Why do the lapping waves taunt me so?
Why do they tell tall stories?

To be and to go; that’s what water is for.
To come here sober was no good at all—
I should have got pie-eyed.
What is ‘here and now’ was ‘later’ then.
So I stare dully at a concrete skeleton.
The pier has disappeared.




[1] For example, in “Iosif Brodskii, ili oda na 1957 god” [Joseph Brodsky, or ode to the year 1957], Losev paints the portrait of a young Brodsky standing at an intersection in his native Leningrad that appears to be a rhymed list of concepts that inhabit Brodsky’s mature poetics, set in italics as if to mark a quotation: “душа крест человек чело / век вещь пространство ничего / сад воздух время море рыба / чернила пыль пол потолок / бумага мышь мысль мотылек / снег мрамор дерево спасибо” [soul cross person forehead / age thing space nothing / garden air time sea fish / ink dust floor ceiling / paper mouse thought moth / snow marble tree thank you] (Losev 2000, 274). In Losev’s poem “Gde vozdukh ‘rozovat ot cherepitsy…’” [Where the air is pinkish from the tiling], written three months after Brodsky’s death, Brodsky is back in Venice, accompanied by his own poetic images of the Italian city: “поди поймай, когда ты там повсюду – / то звонко тронешь чайную посуду / церквей, то ветром пробежишь по саду, / невозвращенец, человек в плаще” [it’s useless trying to catch you there as there you’re everywhere – / at one time touching the china / of the churches, at another running like the wind across the garden, a non-returner, a man in an overcoat] (ibid., 329).

Text © Yakov Klots

Brodsky, Garry Voskov, Loseff on Morton Street, New York 1978
Yasha (Yakov) Klots is a literary scholar, translator, and amateur photographer. His interests include Russia and Eastern Europe, Russian émigré literature and culture, linguistics and language philosophy, and New York City. He is currently working on an anthology of Russian poetry about New York. He is the author of Joseph Brodsky in Lithuania (St. Petersburg: Perlov Design Center, 2010; in Russian), which includes his photographs of Lithuanian towns and rural landscapes. Together with Ross Ufberg, he co-translated intro English Tamara Petkevich’s Memoir of a Gulag Actress (DeKalb: Northern Illinois UP, 2010) and Sergei Dovlatov’s The Outpost: Notes of a Correspondent (under submission). He lives in New York City and teaches Russian language and literature at Yale University.